Representatives from businesses large and small spoke out Tuesday against a proposal that would make Washington just the second state in the country to require employers to provide workers with paid sick leave.
For small employers with narrow profit margins, Senate Bill 6229 would add signficantly to the cost of doing business, forcing some to eliminate other worker benefits -- such as health insurance -- to make up the difference.
For large businesses, even those that already provide workers with paid sick leave, the bill would be an administrative burden and could conflict with existing labor contracts.
For example, Boeing's recent landmark agreement with the Machinist's union does not include an include a waiver for the proposed state law, meaning the contract and the state law would be at odds, Carolyn Ladd, a Boeing attorney, told members of the Senate Labor, Commerce & Consumer Protection Committee.
Proponents of the bill said it's needed to make sure that sick people don't report for work at restaurants and elsewhere, spreading disease.
But business owners said there are already ways to accommodate sick workers and protect public health without adding an expensive state mandate.
Continue reading "Mandatory paid sick leave bill would hurt business and workers" »