Everyone agrees that Puget Sound is worth saving. The economy depends on it. Recreation depends on it. It's what makes the region unique.
But figuring out how to imrpove the health of Puget Sound is fraught with challenges and tension, points that were underscored Tuesday by a four-member panel that discussed work underway to update the Puget Sound Partnership's original action agenda. The document was developed in 2008.
The panel consisted of Martha Konsgaard, chairwoman of the Puget Sound Partnership's Leadership Council; Gerry O'Keefe, the partnership's executive director; Sam Anderson, executive officer of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties; and Sandy Mackie, a land use attorney at Perkins Coie and chairman of AWB's Land Use Committee.
Part of the problem, Konsgaard said, is raising awareness of the issue. "People want to save Puget Sound," she said. "But the challenge is they say, 'Is there a problem?' Many people don't know there is a problem."
The source of the problem isn't what it used to be, either. "The era of the bad guy and one chimney stack is over," she said. "It's really how we're living on the land."